Management Silencing PhysiciansExcerpted from From small, local healthcare facilities to hospitals as prestigious as Yale and Cornell, doctors say they have been targeted by hospital administrators or boards if they warn of unsafe conditions or a colleague's poor work. Even whistleblower laws do not protect them in many cases. Whistleblower laws are supposed to provide legal protection to people trying to report wrongdoing, but they are not adequate to protect whistleblowers in medicine. Over a period of 10 months, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette examined cases across the United States in which physicians who spoke up about poor care faced reprisals, including peer review hearings, demotions, temporary loss of credentials, involuntary transfers or outright dismissal. In a case in Missouri a physician was cited for violating patient confidentiality after he tried to get the possibility of serial murders investigated at the hospital. According the the Post-Gazette, a 1998 survey of 448 emergency physicians across the United States found that 23 percent had either lost a job, or were threatened with it, after they'd raised quality-of-care concerns. Those who have witnessed reprisals against physicians or were
targets themselves are troubled that advocating for better patient care can be
seen as disruptive and lead to serious professional consequences. Some say it's
like arresting a person who yells "A man's been shot!" for violating a noise
ordinance. "There's an attitude that it's better to cover [a problem] up
than to let it be known and correct it, because [a hospital] cannot afford the
consequences of letting anybody find out that it went wrong," said Dr. Edward
Dench, who just completed his year at the reins of the medical society. Dench
said he became a target at Centre Community Hospital after questioning
procedures there. Whistle blowing physicians can find that disagreeing with hospital administrators is career-ending. Once they've been labeled disruptive, doctors may effectively be banished from the profession. This is hospitals silencing doctors by using federal legislation that was intended to protect patients. An even more ironic note is that the silence turns out to be bad for doctors too. Confidentiality laws passed to protect the patient's and the doctor's privacy make it so that physicians who are wrongly or maliciously accused can be pulled into hearings where they have no legal representation and no opportunity to face their accusers. Peer review is not apolitical. The people administering and working in healthcare are not saints. We need systems that recognize that. We should start with systems that listen to patients and enforce the law. Hit your back button to return to where you were
|
Home |
Table of Contents |
It's a Path
|