Full Table of Contents
_______________

Abbreviated
Table of Contents

Home Page
Patient Safety
Silence vs
    Safety
Silenced
White wall
    of Silence
Silencing
Conflict Of
    Interest
Psychology of
    Providers
Subjectivity
Blacklisting  
Nurse survey
Loyalty
Mobbing and
    bullying
Trust Us
Defensive
    documenting
Report Rate
Risk
    managemnt
SOAP
Management
Hospitals
Crime in
    medicine
Sexual Abuse
Liability
    Limitations
Free Speech
    for Patients
Exploitation

OSMB Medical
    Boards
Mammography
solutions
Medical errors
Medical
    Complaints

One number
Links

 

Injured patients who want to help and be heard, click here.

 

Thomas Jefferson said that given the choice between government without newspapers and newspapers without government, he would choose to have newspapers.

In medicine we have government without newspapers. Patients cannot find out what they need to know to make informed choices. No one in medicine records or reports the information patients need to know the most. So patients will have to.

<Truth / Justice / Patient Safety>
 
It's a path

Recent patient safety news

Medicine's assumption that most claims are frivolous

In the March 16, 2003 magazine section of the New York Times, Abraham Verghese, M.D. suggested "sending all malpractice suits to regional panels . . . to screen and eliminate those with no merit" as a way to reduce frivolous suits. Repeatedly in medicine it is implied, and apparently believed, that most suits are frivolous. In fact most legitimate suits cannot find lawyers because they are not easy-win, big-money cases. More than 90% of cases brought to medical malpractice lawyers are rejected during the first few minutes of the first phone call (according to med mal lawyers) not because they are not legitimate, but because the odds and the payout are not attractive enough.

The panel suggested by Dr. Verghese could result in a greater number of suits if legitimacy, rather than profit, were the criterion.

Progress

Another article in the same magazine section is subtitled "The history of medicine4.1% of sentinel events in medicine are assault/rape/homicide is a long, serpentine narrative of the death of old ideas giving way to the birth of new ones." The idea that M.D.s can police M.D.s is one of those old ideas (see Citizen's Oversight Group). So is the idea that healthcare professionals can be trusted to ensure patient safety. They take care of each other before they take care of patients (see loyalty) with devastating results for the patients. Click patient safety quiz for a nearly amusing interactive explanation.

Healthcare professionals have always been regarded as the guys in the white hats. That is changing. It wouldn't have to if they would clean up their act. But they won't.

Freedom of speech for patients

It is time for the who, what, when and where (and maybe even the why) of problems in medicine to be known and discussed so that fewer patients are assaulted, raped and murdered. Healthcare workers will not report even criminal acts let alone negligence and errors, so patients have to be able to.

The banter of the bazaar is essential to safety and it is shut down by privacy laws and defamation suits and settlements. Patients need to be able to speak and learn about medicine and health care workers the same way they can about politics and politicians.

At one time it was illegal to publish anything that could bring Congress or the President into contempt or disrepute. How that squelched discussion and the flow of information finally was recognized. It now must be recognized in medicine. The well being of the public is too important to sacrifice for the comfort of healthcare workers. They will have to develop thicker skins and accept that they are not above law and criticism.

Medicine is not for doctors and nurses. It is for patients, and the safety of patients requires that patients be able to talk about their experiences without getting sued. See freedom of speech for patients.

First documentation of blacklisting?

Physicians tend to be in denial about it, but beyond the White Wall of Silence is blacklisting patients. For what might be the first documentation proving it and for how to get care in spite of it, see blacklisting patients.

*  *  *

A phrase I use so much that I finally created an acronym for it consisting of the first letters of each of the first six words in the phrase:
"Because Of The Nature Of Jurisprudence in this country I cannot make statements about that."
Acronym: BOT NOJ.

_____________________________________________________________

Home | Table of Contents | It's a Path
Silence versus Patient Safety
Loyalty versus Patient Safety
The White Wall of Silence versus Patient Safety
Blacklisting Patients
Freedom of Speech for Patients
Medical Complaints - How to

 < Truth / Justice / Patient Safety >
It's a path

If you want to say something about any of my sites, my email address is on almost every page. I am listening. I will be sensitive to what you say.

To contact me, click email
Copyright © 2011 All rights reserved
Site revised November 29, 2011